Blog

 
     

Are Government Background Checks too Slow?

By Michael Klazema on 10/29/2013

It's a question that has been asked over and over again in the background check industry: when it comes to employment screening, who gets the job done better, federal agencies or private companies? Often, employers assume that the government will do "better" background checks because it has a wider ranger of resources and more immediate access to court files, arrest reports, criminal records, and other databases.

In reality, private organizations sometimes have more resources than government agencies and can locate an applicant's "red flags"-ostensibly, criminal records with a serious criminal conviction-just as well as any federal, state or local entity. With products like US OneSEARCH, backgroundchecks.com is a firm which can cover more ground more quickly than the average government agency.

The USOneSEARCH product has access to well over 1,000 local and state sources throughout the country, checking a subject's name and birth date against some 450 million criminal records. Furthermore, the US OneSEARCH based background check reports can literally be completed in seconds, giving organizations the information they need to make an informed decision about applicants and other subjects sooner rather than later.

Instantaneous background reports and accountability are enough to make independent background check companies competitive with federal, state and local government organizations in most situations, and can handily outstrip what government background checkers can do. Take a recent news story out of New York State, where some caretaking companies are being forced to wait between 4 and 6 weeks to get background check reports back from a state-run screening program.

Such a lengthy wait leaves these caretaking businesses-many of which provide care for disabled people-in a tight spot. State law dictates that employees must pass a background check before being permitted to work by themselves with a disabled customer. The fear is that, if backgrounds go unchecked for weeks, some organizations will provisionally hire a person and unscrupulous employees will take advantage of their vulnerable wards.

With weeks or months elapsing between an interview and a start date, caretaking organizations are either forced to double up their employees-unapproved employees can work with the disabled as long as they are supervised by another person who has already passed the background check-or to hope that their promising candidates are willing to wait around, unemployed, for a background check to go through.

In other words, whether the issue is a necessary background checks or a gridlock of red tape, New York's state government doesn't appear to offer speedy employee screening solutions. Independent entities like backgroundchecks.com, with instant criminal searches that span every state, would be able to address and solve such a problem in moments

Source: http://www.whec.com/news/stories/S3200571.shtml


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.