Washington State Patrol Revamps Employment Screening Requirements

By Michael Klazema on 1/8/2014

While most hiring organizations, from school districts to nursing homes, are tightening up employment screening policies and expanding the scope of background check procedures, the Washington State Police appear to be standing apart from the crowd by doing just the opposite. In fact, the state police force is actually loosening its employment screening requirements in an effort to widen the pool of potential applicants.

According to a report recently published by KIRO News, a local Washington news station based in Seattle, the Washington State Patrol has long required its applicants to meet a wide range of qualification prerequisites in order to be considered for a job as a trooper. For instance, until now, state troopers have not been allowed to have any visible tattoos.

That particular requirement is a bit more unusual than the others, which mostly concerned instances of drug use or possession. For example, an applicant with more than five drug offenses on his or her record would have been disqualified from consideration, as would someone with any drug offense recorded in the past three years and any marijuana offense recorded in the past 12 months. Finally, any use of heroin or opiates has traditionally been considered an automatic blacklist offense within the Washington State Patrol.

Most of those requirements are not uncommonly seen in employment screening standards for police officers. However, Robert Calkins, a trooper with the Washington State Patrol, told KIRO News that the force was having difficulty filling its academy classes, and that he believed the staunch nature of the screening requirements might be scaring potential applicants away. In Calkins’ estimation, there are plenty of perfectly qualified people out there who could make fine state troopers. By loosening screening requirements, the force hopes to cater to that a different crowd of applicants. Unfortunately, some also worry that the lax background check policies will allow corruption and crime to creep into the force.

Of course, background check policies aren’t the only reason the Washington State Force is in decline, as far as employment numbers are concerned. A vast percentage of the force’s troopers were hired in the 1980s and 1990s, and are now nearing retirement time. Calkins estimates that as many as 223 troopers could leave the force in the next four years for retirement purposes alone. Add in all of the other possible departures that may come in that time, and the Washington State Patrol is clearly reaching dire straits. A new employment push with slightly relaxed hiring standards could help to correct the shortage.

Not all of the screening standards will be thrown out the window, however. Applicants for the Washington State Patrol will still have to undergo a traditional criminal background check and any applicant found with felony convictions, traces of domestic violence, or drug-dealing history would automatically be classified as “unfit for duty.” In addition to the criminal background check, troopers must give a full history – including their academic and professional pasts – undergo a variety of written and oral tests, and submit to medical and physical examinations.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.