Tompkins County, New York Passes Legislation to Ban the Box

By Michael Klazema on 7/14/2016

Tompkins County has officially become the latest jurisdiction in the state of New York to ban the box for public employees. The county, which houses the city of Ithaca, is the third county and the 11th jurisdiction in New York to ban the box. The city of Ithaca previously banned the box for public employees. Other counties that have removed criminal history questions from county job applications include Dutchess County and Ulster County.

According to a report from, the Tompkins County Legislature took a vote on the new ban the box policy at a July 5th meeting. The policy received unanimous support from legislators and will be implemented as law "within the next two months."

Unlike with some other ban the box policies, the measure that has been approved in Tompkins County will not apply to every county position. For instance, the report notes that elected officials will still be expected to disclose criminal convictions upfront. This mandated disclosure requirement will remain in place thanks to New York's "Public Officers Law," which bars felons from taking elected positions and "places restrictions" on individuals whose records include misdemeanor offenses. The policy will also have no impact on the Ithaca City School District—presumably because the city's existing public ban the box policy will take precedent.

All other jobs in the Tompkins County public sphere will be impacted by the new policy. The policy will influence practices throughout the county not just for countywide services and departments but also for all cities, towns, and villages located within the county. The policy will apply to all school districts aside from Ithaca City School District. Employers will be asked to remove questions about criminal history from their job applications.

Based on recent reports, the policy won't require a background check as part of the screening process. With many ban the box policies, employers are barred from running background checks until they make an offer of employment. Once that offer has been extended, the employer is free to run a background check. The results can determine whether or not the employer keeps the offer of employment on the table or withdraws it due to a discovery.

According to the article, Tompkins County is different. Instead of only permitting employers to run background checks on finalists with employment offers, the county's policy would delay county employers from asking applicants about criminal history until the final round of screening. The ban the box policy gives the county room to ask finalists whether or not they have any criminal convictions on their records.

Candidates are expected to disclose their criminal history in the final stage of the screening process. The county's "personnel department" then looks at the convictions and weighs them in relation to the job or jobs at hand. If a conviction raises concern, an applicant might be disqualified. In cases in which the applicant has a criminal conviction on his or her record but is cleared by the personnel department, information about that person's criminal past would be kept secret. The information would stay in the hands of the personnel department and would not be passed to the department head in charge of making the final hiring decision.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.