Blog

 
     

Georgia Bus Driver Had History of Child Molestation

By Michael Klazema on 9/11/2017
A man with a charge for child molestation drove a school bus for two and a half years in Cobb County, Georgia, per a recent report from the Marietta Daily Journal. The article detailed the story of Joseph Farrington, who was arrested in December 1999 for child molestation. The specific details of that charge are unclear. Because Farrington had no previous criminal history on his record at the time, he could enter a plea for misdemeanor sexual battery.

Per coverage, the “first offender” plea complicates the case and explains why Cobb County School District, which employed Farrington from November 2013 until May 2016, didn’t know about the charge. The district has a policy of running background checks on all new employees. This policy includes multiple criminal screenings with state criminal checks and FBI fingerprint background checks. The district’s deputy superintendent confirmed that those checks were run on Farrington in 2013 and that they returned no signs of criminal history.

In addition to the actual background checks, reports note, the school has a zero-tolerance hiring policy for individuals with felony offenses. Since Farrington pleaded his charge down to a misdemeanor, he wouldn’t have fallen into that group. The Cobb County School District deputy superintendent stated that the district disqualifies candidates for certain types of misdemeanors. These misdemeanors include crimes that are sexual in nature, crimes that involve drugs, or crimes against children.

Under that criteria, Farrington would not have been considered a hirable candidate by the district. However, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) was not permitted to disclose Farrington’s record to potential employers. As coverage explains, the GBI maintains the criminal record database that employers search when they run state criminal checks in Georgia. Before July 2004, first offenders could use Georgia’s first offender statute to expunge certain charges from their record. To discharge his misdemeanor sexual battery count, Farrington had to complete his probation period without incident. Since Farrington did so, GBI was not legally allowed to disclose the misdemeanor.

Georgia law has changed a bit in the years since Farrington’s arrest, reports indicate: today, his sexual battery charge would have been a felony, not a misdemeanor. Per critics of the policy, the first offender statute remains in place today, making it feasible that a similar situation could happen again in the future.

Cobb County District Attorney Vic Reynolds told the Marietta Daily Journal that he wants a change. Reynolds believes that crimes against children and crimes that are sexual in nature should not be absolved under the first offender statute. For the first offender statute to change, the Georgia Legislature would have to change the law. There is currently no legislation pending that would bring about those revisions.

Per reports, Farrington was reportedly a model employee while working for the Cobb County School District. The district didn’t get any complaints from students or parents during his two and a half years as a bus driver. Farrington resigned from the bus driver position last spring, but did so voluntarily, not because of any incident or allegation.



Sources: 

http://www.mdjonline.com/news/former-cobb-bus-driver-had-molestation-record/article_2865048a-9371-11e7-90f5-4308e8daf5f7.html


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 11 The Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General criticized a migrant youth detention center on the border for not running the proper background checks. Federal law requires the facility to screen all employees with FBI fingerprint checks.
  • December 06 In a bid to combat money laundering and illicit funding sources for terrorists flowing through the country's real estate sector, Singapore's government now mandates background checks for buyers purchasing properties prior to development.
  • December 04 What is a reference check? How does it vary from a work history check? We explore these questions and others.
  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 For hiring managers to verify the information provided on a resume, verification is essential.  Such is the purpose of employment history background checks.
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 21

    Verification checks are a powerful way to assess how truthful a job candidate has been on his or her application or resume. These checks can verify work history, education verification, professional licenses, and favorable personal qualities.