Georgia Bus Driver Had History of Child Molestation

By Michael Klazema on 9/11/2017
A man with a charge for child molestation drove a school bus for two and a half years in Cobb County, Georgia, per a recent report from the Marietta Daily Journal. The article detailed the story of Joseph Farrington, who was arrested in December 1999 for child molestation. The specific details of that charge are unclear. Because Farrington had no previous criminal history on his record at the time, he could enter a plea for misdemeanor sexual battery.

Per coverage, the “first offender” plea complicates the case and explains why Cobb County School District, which employed Farrington from November 2013 until May 2016, didn’t know about the charge. The district has a policy of running background checks on all new employees. This policy includes multiple criminal screenings with state criminal checks and FBI fingerprint background checks. The district’s deputy superintendent confirmed that those checks were run on Farrington in 2013 and that they returned no signs of criminal history.

In addition to the actual background checks, reports note, the school has a zero-tolerance hiring policy for individuals with felony offenses. Since Farrington pleaded his charge down to a misdemeanor, he wouldn’t have fallen into that group. The Cobb County School District deputy superintendent stated that the district disqualifies candidates for certain types of misdemeanors. These misdemeanors include crimes that are sexual in nature, crimes that involve drugs, or crimes against children.

Under that criteria, Farrington would not have been considered a hirable candidate by the district. However, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) was not permitted to disclose Farrington’s record to potential employers. As coverage explains, the GBI maintains the criminal record database that employers search when they run state criminal checks in Georgia. Before July 2004, first offenders could use Georgia’s first offender statute to expunge certain charges from their record. To discharge his misdemeanor sexual battery count, Farrington had to complete his probation period without incident. Since Farrington did so, GBI was not legally allowed to disclose the misdemeanor.

Georgia law has changed a bit in the years since Farrington’s arrest, reports indicate: today, his sexual battery charge would have been a felony, not a misdemeanor. Per critics of the policy, the first offender statute remains in place today, making it feasible that a similar situation could happen again in the future.

Cobb County District Attorney Vic Reynolds told the Marietta Daily Journal that he wants a change. Reynolds believes that crimes against children and crimes that are sexual in nature should not be absolved under the first offender statute. For the first offender statute to change, the Georgia Legislature would have to change the law. There is currently no legislation pending that would bring about those revisions.

Per reports, Farrington was reportedly a model employee while working for the Cobb County School District. The district didn’t get any complaints from students or parents during his two and a half years as a bus driver. Farrington resigned from the bus driver position last spring, but did so voluntarily, not because of any incident or allegation.

Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.