Blog

 
     

Indiana Un-Bans the Box

By Michael Klazema on 5/27/2017

The new law which takes effect on July 1, 2017, will affect the 2014 “ban the box” ordinance in place of Indianapolis and Marion County.

In addition, the bill states that an employee or former employee’s criminal history information may not be introduced as evidence against an employer in a civil action based on the conduct of the employee or former employee if:

  1. The nature of the criminal history information of the employee or former employee does not bear a direct relationship to the facts underlying the civil action;
  2. Before the acts giving rise to the civil action occurred:
    • A court order sealed the record of the criminal case;
    • The criminal conviction has been reversed or vacated;
    • The criminal conviction has been expunged under IC 35-38-9;
    • The employee or former employee received a pardon for the criminal conviction; or
  3. The criminal history concerns an arrest or a charge that did not result in a criminal conviction.
Indiana is the fourth state to pass an “un-ban the box” law, along with Tennessee (Senate Bill 2103), Mississippi (Senate Bill 2689)) and Michigan (House Bill 4052 (2015)).

What this Means to You

  • This update applies to all employers in Indiana.
  • The new law restricts local government from adopting any ban-the-box ordinances in Indiana.
  • An employee or former employee’s criminal history information may not be used against an employer in a civil action based on the conduct of the employee or former employee under certain conditions.
Senate Bill 312 is available here for review.
Industry News

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • February 18 Background checks show criminal convictions and sometimes arrests, but do they show warrants? We look at the different types of warrants and discuss the likelihood that each will appear on a background check.
  • February 18 Hundreds of ex-clergy members are working as licensed teachers and therapists or in other roles that put them in close quarters with children. States are now using abuse lists from dioceses in the licensing background check process.
  • February 13 In its pursuit of municipal contracts, one of the world's largest private security companies faces intense questions over reports of lax procedures and questionable hiring choices.
  • February 11 Should your business be running social media background checks? For many reasons, this background screening is not the right choice for most employers.
  • February 11 Are you planning to visit a loved one in jail? Prisons and correctional facilities have different approaches to processing visitation applications, but most will conduct criminal background checks.
  • February 06

    Should background checks only concern criminal history? Issues with federal hiring highlight the need to look beneath the surface by examining applicant claims.

  • February 04

    Could your business be vulnerable to a lawsuit from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)? A recent settlement between the EEOC and Dollar General outlines how a criminal history background check policy can inadvertently lead to discrimination.

     

  • February 04

    Every employer approaches the employee background check process a little bit differently. Many factors go into designing an adequate background check method for your business, including the duties and responsibilities of the open position.

  • January 30 AI is among the most popular tech buzzwords in every industry today, including the hiring sector. Developers contend that AI tools will ultimately eliminate bias, but doubts remain.
  • January 28

    A recent New York law restricts landlords in their ability to conduct tenant background checks or evict problem tenants. Some landlords are pushing for its repeal.