Indiana Makes Technical Correction Affecting Criminal History Providers

By Michael Klazema on 4/5/2014

In early August 2013, reported on the passage of Indiana House Bill 1392 which, among other things, amended laws about criminal history providers. The bill was drafted after a study committee reviewed and amended a law that had passed in 2012 (House Bill 1033), with an effective date of July 2013. A purpose of House Bill 1392 was to adjust the law to permit criminal history providers the ability to provide certain information relating to an incident that did not result in a conviction (for example, pending arrest cases). But, after House Bill 1392 passed, House Bill 1006 (2013) amended the same sections of the Indiana Code. Its authors apparently had not noted the passage of House Bill 1392, so accidentally re-instated parts of the law as it was in effect after House Bill 1033 and before House Bill 1392.

The version of Indiana Code § 24-4-18-6 that reflected the amendments as passed in House Bill 1392 was less restrictive and permitted the release of records that did not result in a conviction. Another version of Indiana Code § 24-4-18-6 restored the restrictive language which permitted a criminal history provider to provide only criminal history information that relates to a conviction, and prohibited the release of information that relates to infractions, arrests, or charges that did not result in a conviction.

Because there were two conflicting versions of the law, House Bill 1006 (2014) – confusingly the same bill number as in 2013 - was introduced in the 2014 legislative session. Section 35 (pgs. 44 & 45) of the bill provides a technical correction reflecting the intent of the study committee. This bill again amends Indiana Code § 24-4-18-6 to allow criminal history providers to release records that did not result in a conviction, such as pending arrest cases. It was passed by the legislature on March 18, 2014, and Governor Mike Pence signed it on March 26, 2014.

House Bill 1006 (2014) goes into effect July 1, 2014. It is available here:’s compliance update dated August 17, 2012:’s compliance update dated August 2, 2013:

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • August 10 Moore Advanced teamed up with to secure the best possible hires. Read more about how this process has assisted them.
  • August 10 An adjudication withheld is a court agreement that doesn’t qualify as a conviction but can make matters confusing for individuals applying for jobs. Should you disclose a withheld adjudication to a prospective employer?
  • August 09 With adults now legally using recreational marijuana in numerous states, and with additional legalization efforts in the wings, expungement of old and minor drug-related convictions is more important than ever.
  • August 07 A West Virginia TV station is pushing the state’s Child Protective Services and Department of Health and Human Services to answer questions about background check policies. A CPS employee was recently charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, domestic assault, and threatening a police officer.
  • August 02 Woes continue for ridesharing companies struggling to keep riders safe after a man, illegally in the United States, was arrested and accused of several rapes dating back years.
  • July 31 South Carolina legislators recently passed a new law that will change the language of the state’s expungement policy. The new law will make expungement possible for repeat offenders. The previous law only allowed first offenses to be scrubbed from the public record.
  • July 26

    Hawaii employers have been banned from asking job applicants about their salary history. The new act’s effective date is January 1, 2019, and covers all employers that have at least one employee in that state.

  • July 26

    The expansion of the The North Carolina Certificate of Relief  Law, offers relief to jobseekers. An employer may take into consideration a certificate of relief despite the applicant’s criminal past; however, the certificate is not an expungement or pardon.

  • July 26

    With growing concerns about liability, businesses are transitioning away from one-time background checks in favor of continuous checks. The results are impacting both employers and employees.

  • July 25 Uber is officially launching a new ongoing criminal monitoring policy for drivers. The company started rolling out the new system in early July and will expand it in the months to come.