Juvenile Record Bars Man from Teaching Internship

By Michael Klazema on 7/24/2012

A Florida man has been told his juvenile felony conviction will disqualify him from continuing in a teaching internship program. Travis Hudson, 33, was convicted when he was 15 years old for being an accessory to a crime, which is considered a felony. Hudson knew about a burglary but failed to report it. Since he was able to obtain employment as an adult without any problems, Hudson thought his conviction was put behind him. He wasn’t worried when it came time for a background check to complete the last of his internship for the Bartow School District since he believed his juvenile records to be sealed. However, according to Don Wilson, labor lawyer for the School District, when public agencies conduct background checks in Florida they have access to sealed records. Hudson was required to complete the internship in order to receive a bachelor’s degree in education and his teacher’s certificate. He had already completed two 16-week internships at two different elementary schools within the School District. For those internship stints, Hudson and other University of South Florida Polytechnic elementary education students were fingerprinted prior to their participation. Wilson contends that USF Poly and Hudson were informed that he was ineligible for the internship from the outset. However, Hudson was permitted to participate in the internships, according to Wilson, since he was “at no time…left alone with the children.” Hudson was then set to participate in a teaching internship through a minority schoolteacher program, when a background check revealed his criminal past.

Several school districts across the state of Florida have a policy of not hiring convicted felons similar to the Bartow School District. While other school districts will consider applicants with felonies, Hudson said it wouldn’t be a convenient option for him due to his five children. Frank O’Reilly, a Bartow School Board member, doesn’t want to see a change in the hiring policy, but believes there should be an appeals process for sitiuations such as Hudson’s. According to O’Reilly, “I think it is unfair. I don’t think it should be on his record.” Another School Board member, Debra Wright, would like to see more done for Hudson. She is “very disappointed” and thinks a blanket policy will “narrow [their] ability to hire.”

Hudson’s case is representative of the reason some states such as Massachusetts have recently passed laws restricting access to criminal records as discussed in the article Massachusetts Revises Law to Both Give and Restrict Employer’s Access to Criminal Records . No matter the specifics of the laws in your area, it is up to employers to decide whether or not to carry out background checks on potential employees. Once that decision has been made it becomes important to comply with both federal and state legislations covering employment screening. By using a reputable company like, you can be assured you are getting both the best and most thorough screening techniques available and access to compliance information and advice. With access to countless criminal databases nationwide they have many options available, several with instant results. Their US OneSEARCH gives you instant information from more than 430 million criminal records from counties, Department of Corrections (DOC), Administration of Courts (AOC) and State Sex Offender Registries covering 49 states plus Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and Guam. Also included are national and international terrorism sources, more than 11 million photos, and their proprietary database of previously completed reports.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.