Legislation for Required Background Checks at ECE Facilities Could Sweep States Nationwide

By Michael Klazema on 4/15/2013

A new legislation will be filed to demand stricterbackground checks and sex offender verification procedure for those wishing to become licensed in the early childhood education fields. The legislation is slotted to affect the state of Massachusetts, but the precedent could easily change the methodology for the entire country.

The proposed bill will make the requirements for the state’s background checks much stricter and add license suspensions and fines levied to those who do not properly require the checks to be enacted. It will also increase the taxation to the state’s overall oversight. The spark to the increased need for appropriate measures was a startling lacking of The Department of Early Education and Cares’ policy of these background checks in the state of Massachusetts.

More than two-thousand early child care centers in Lowell and Essex counties in Massachusetts alone were found to have failed in their duties to have their employees undergo strenuous background checks before employment. A report made in March showed many of these facilities were using poor methods to carry out their checks. This was in addition to the fact that many had cases of health and safety violations, few corrections were being made by the license-holders, and many inspection and background check notices were going unannounced. They also failed to verify licenses against the sex offender registry.

Many of these facilities were not using appropriate methods of sex offender database checking, failing to check all members of the new employee’s household, not just the personnel who have unsupervised contact with the children, and when violations were found, the corrective measures were not implemented properly. If the issue was not corrected, the state has a policy to remove the licensing from the holder. A report found that one hundred and nineteen licensed early education personnel were registered sex offenders, listed by their residence. The personnel had either not been working directly with the children or had changed addresses in the last six-months. Four of the facilities where these sex offenders were found employed, were without viable testing procedures and had their license revoked. These cases highlighted the need for increased background check efficiency and sex offender database checking in all accounts where children are being supervised.

The legislation being written would increase the requirements for these cases, making it necessary to thoroughly check all personnel against the sex offender’s registry and criminal records history, including those who lived in the same household as the potential employee. It would also require non-licensed personnel to receive the same cross-examinations, including those without unsupervised contact with the children and all members of in-home child care facilities over the age of fifteen. It would also require all changes in employment status to be reported to the proper authorities. The childcare facilities that fail in this duty would have their licenses suspended until such time as thebackground checks was completed, and those facilities that knowingly employed criminal offenders or registered sex offenders would lose their licensing and face jail time and/or fines.

For organizations that need to run frequent background checks and checks against sex offender registries, working with makes the proces simple and affordable. They can obtain instant results from their US OneSEARCH product, which checks over 450 million criminal records nationwide. They can also just use their US Registered Offender OneSEARCH tool (included in the US OneSEARCH product) , which checks specifically for crimes that require registration with state sex and other offender registries. It might also be a good idea to put Ongoing Criminal Monitoring in place. This way, if a new record under the name and date of birth for a current employee or household members is added to the US OneSEARCH national database after they have already received employment, the employer will be made aware of that criminal record.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) and cofounder of the Expungement Clearinghouse - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.