North Carolina Meals on Wheel Workers Quit over Background Checks

By Michael Klazema on 1/17/2014

Volunteer background checks are a necessity in many situations nowadays, from youth sports to caretaking initiatives. One such caretaking business, the Meals on Wheels branch of Sylva, North Carolina (located in Jackson County) recently instituted a new background screening initiative for its volunteers. Many longtime workers for the division were incredibly displeased by the new screening requirement, so much so that a few of them have opted to give up their volunteer positions rather than have their integrity questioned by a background check.

To be fair, the Sylva Meals on Wheels branch, run by the Jackson County Department on Aging, did not design the new background check policy of its own volition. In fact, the new background check initiative is a countywide movement and is something that County Manager Chuck Wooten has been working toward for quite some time now, according to a local publication called The Sylva Herald. Wooten was concerned about the fact that Jackson County’s ranks of volunteers – which includes between 200 and 300 individuals – were allowed to serve in a variety of county services without proper background check clearance. County Commissioners saw reason in Wooten’s concerns and decided to protect the county by requiring all volunteers to submit to mandatory background checks – regardless of position or time of service.

The fact that a service like Meals on Wheels would require background checks for its employees and volunteers is hardly surprising. The service, which brings meals to aging or disabled citizens still living on their own, gives its workers access to vulnerable people and plentiful opportunities for theft or fraud. A move by a Meals on Wheels branch to require background checks is as natural and essential as a nursing home or caring facility instituting those requirements.

It also isn’t shocking that Jackson County chose to screen all of its volunteers, regardless of how many years of good service different volunteers had already given to the community. It is impossible to know who is a criminal or a sex offender without a background check, and Jackson County is protecting itself from liability by requiring all volunteers to submit to background checks. The checks now required for volunteers are, according to Wooten, identical to those that are required of actual county employees. In other words, they are pretty much standard issue employment background checks, including searches of national criminal databases, sex offender registries, and driving histories. has services available for such checks, as well as for more unique screenings such as employment and academic verifications.

Still, despite the self-explanatory nature of Jackson County’s new volunteer background check procedure, many of the volunteers for Sylva’s Meals on Wheels branch took the policy amendment as a personal insult. The branch lost numerous longtime volunteers who felt that, after years of spotless service and countless hours of faithful volunteer work, they deserved a bit more trust from the county. The volunteers chose to quit their positions rather than submit to background checks, leaving Sylva’s Meals on Wheels branch a hair understaffed as it heads into 2014. The branch currently consists of about 70 volunteers and is hoping to find a few more to replace the stalwart veterans who chose to discontinue their service.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.