EEOC looses key courtcase over disparate impact of background checks and credit reports

By Michael Klazema on 8/12/2013

In what by many is described as a serious blow to the EEOC's perspective on the disparate impact of the use background checks and credit reports onn minorities, U.S. District Judge Roger Titus ruled against the agency in the case of EEOC vs. Freeman. Freeman is an event management company that used both criminal background checks and credit reports in their pre-employment screening process in an effort to reduce the risk of more embezzlement and workplace violence it had been experiencing.

The EEOC targeted the company  for its hiring practices across a five year time span, not because they felt the company actively discriminated againast any particular minority,  but simply because the impact of the company using criminal background checks and credit reports alledgedly caused a disparate impact on the chances of minorities to get a job at the company, because ceretain groups of minorities have for example more criminal convictions than caucasians.

In this case the judge felt that the EEOC not only presented bad data as evidence of disparate impact, but also that the type and extent of that data - even it had been correct - would by far not be enough to justify a disparate impact claim based in relation to criminal background checks by Freeman.

In the absence of any significant case law it appeared as if companies interpreting the EEOC guidance for running criminnal background checks were forced to choose between completing foregoing criminal record checks or risking lawsuits from the EEOC. Freeman early on felt they were justified in using criminal records in their pre-employment screening process and were vindicated last week

The EEOC has targeted a number of other high profile employers in disparate impact lawsuits and if those outcomes mimic this one, more certainty will finally exist for employers nationwide to safely rely on criminal background checks with less risk of being targeted by the EEOC.




Founded during the Internet boom in 1999 by an executive in both the staffing and information industry, – a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – has been able to create a service that provides a blend of flexible screening programs that included instant, cost effective and comprehensive solutions. Our experience in database modeling of public records information has led to become the leader in the acquisition and delivery of public records information by harnessing the power and technology of the Internet. To learn more visit




Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.