Government Will No Longer Allow Outside Contractors to Review Federal Background Checks

By Michael Klazema on 2/11/2014

Last month, the Federal Government filed suit against USIS, one of their largest contractors for security clearance background checks, for allegedly delivering 665,000 fake, fraudulent, or incomplete background check reports. USIS had been the firm responsible for vetting countless government employees, including Edward Snowden, who leaked thousands of sensitive government documents, and Aaron Alexis, who killed a dozen people in a Navy Yard shooting last fall. By trusting USIS to run background checks and provide reports that cleared employees to operate within the government, the Office of Personnel Management worries that it may have unwittingly created a major set of threats to national security.

That particular worry has inspired the Office of Personnel Management and the Federal Government as a whole to make a major change regarding employee background checks and government contractors. Going forward, the Office of Personnel Management will continue to use contractor companies to run background checks on employees and security clearance candidates. However, it will no longer trust the contractors with the step of reviewing their own background checks.

In the past, some contractor workers have been permitted to take on parts of the review process. That problem was what made it possible for USIS to submit more than half a million faulty background checks, over the course of several years, without anyone at the Office of Personnel Management noticing. The contractor firm was basically using a computer program to automatically approve mass numbers of background check reports without ever actually reviewing them. This automated process, known as “dumping,” will likely be the core topic of discussion once the government's fraud lawsuit against USIS reaches the court. It's also something that the Office of Personnel Management is hoping to avoid ever having to deal with again by mandating a more thorough review process.

Ostensibly, the system in the future will go something like this: the Office of Personnel Management will send information about an employee or prospective employee to a contractor, who will then perform a background check. A report of that background check will then be returned to the Office of Personnel Management, where it will be fully reviewed and either approved or disapproved in-house.

The Office of Personnel Management's Federal Investigative Services division, which has long overseen Federal background checks, but which also outsources much of the work to contractors like USIS, may or may not have the manpower to comfortably manage the new workload that these background check reviews will represent. However, Katherine Archuleta, the director of the Office of Personnel Management, has stated that the Federal Investigative Services department will weather the changes by having employees work overtime and by bringing in workers from other parts of the organization to help with the load.

In other words, it will likely be a tumultuous couple of months at the Office of Personnel Management when the background check review policy officially changes on February 24. Still, Archuleta believes the extra work will be worth it to make sure that federal security clearance background checks have a consistent and dependable quality control filter.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.