Blog

 
     

Compliance and Legislation Update - The EEOC and Me

By Michael Klazema on 9/14/2010

The situation

A few years ago, had you asked the average businessman his personal philosophy on background screening, his response would’ve likely been something to the effect of “better safe than sorry.”  Better to screen every applicant, to eliminate any applicant with a blemish on their record, than to face a due diligence lawsuit.

Now that opinion is changing.  By taking “better safe than sorry” truly to heart, businesses have started to run afoul of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).  According to the EEOC, making employment decisions (specifically hiring or retention decisions) based on arrest and convictions or on credit reports has a disparate impact on minorities.

The EEOC has also determined that they would generally analyze the following items to determine if a hiring/retention decision was a business necessity or if it was discriminatory:

  1. The nature and gravity of the offense(s);
  2. How much time has passed since the conviction and/or completion of the sentence, and
  3. The nature of the job held or sought.

The forecast

These two differing opinions have put many businesses between a rock and a hard place. Businesses can’t stop doing background checks completely without opening themselves to due diligence lawsuits but to continue in the vein of running all checks on everyone opens the business to discrimination lawsuits.

Ideally, in order to avoid the potential lawsuits, each company would do the following:

  • Look at the risks that a hypothetical criminal in a given job poses to the organization, its customers and its other employees. This can include access to people who are easily victimized (e.g. children), access to easily stolen information or things, and even access to other employees.
  • Consider mitigation of those risks from the job itself. There are two major types of on-the-job risk mitigation: supervision and availability to the public. By these standards, a night watchman who would typically work alone should be subjected to a different set of checks than a cashier who would typically work with a manager nearby. Similarly, a school guidance counselor is much more private than even a teacher and should be subjected to different searches.
  • Look for evidence in your applicants of the kind of criminal behavior that leads to those risks. This is where you should determine what types of checks are necessary for each applicant. Is there a financial risk with a CFO? Absolutely and that may warrant a credit check. Is there a financial risk with the mail room clerk? Unlikely and running a credit check would probably just be a waste of resources.
  • Consider attenuation of that evidence due to the passage of time and any evidence of rehabilitation. The key here would be to consider your grading criteria. Can a single misdemeanor be ignored for a job class? How old is the record? Is there any evidence of rehabilitation?

What it comes down to is that each job class has a different risk profile and because of that, not each job class can be treated the same. The possible risks need to be carefully weighed for each class and policies need to be updated to reflect these risks.


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • May 21 A bill currently awaiting the governor’s signature in Florida would institute new regulations for the state’s cosmetic surgery industry. Since 2008, 13 patients have died in botched surgeries at four South Florida clinics run by convicted felons.
  • May 16 Following the passing of a new federal law, daycare providers in North Dakota found themselves constrained and struggling to meet demand. In response, the state has streamlined its process.
  • May 14

    After dismissing several black workers at an Illinois distribution center, Walmart is facing EEOC complaints that claim its background check policies have a disparate impact on minorities.

     

  • May 09 Aiming to create a fairer rental economy, Colorado's governor recently signed legislation putting new limits on how landlords can use background checks.
  • May 07 A lawyer is gathering clients for a potential lawsuit against the Boy Scouts of America. The clients range from 15 to 75 years of age and have all alleged sexual abuse against BSA leaders.
  • May 02 Following a high-profile IPO, and in an ongoing effort to improve the real and perceived safety of its ridesharing services, Lyft has joined the growing list of companies using ongoing criminal monitoring.
  • April 30 97 percent of employers run at least one type of background check. Are there any jobs available with no background check required?
  • April 30 New programs and presentations in Indiana are helping individuals in the state learn more about criminal record expungement. Indiana passed a “second chance law” regarding expungement in 2013.
  • April 25 With a new "Clean Slate" bill before the Connecticut legislature, lawmakers must consider whether to automatically expunge certain criminal records. Proponents say it will broaden opportunities and reduce recidivism.
  • April 23 Hospital background checks are an important safeguard for protecting patients and shielding hospitals from liability and legal risk. Here are some of the most common healthcare background checks.