Blog

 
     

Once Prison Guards are in, Their Corruption Goes Unchecked

By Michael Klazema on 3/30/2012

When we think of prisons, we often think of all the corrupt convicts living behind bars.  According to the LA Times though, corruption is also on the rise among prison guards.  An FBI sting resulted in the conviction of three Sheriff’s guards and the firing of one.  It also led to video-taped confessions and prisoners informing of other possible corruption.  While most cases of this sort have been found in California prisons, the problem isn’t limited to that state.  In fact, arrests of Federal Prison Guards increased nationwide by 90%.  Although not all of these ended in convictions, the prevalence does lead officials to believe that the number of guards they have discovered smuggling drugs and other contraband into prisons is just the tip of the iceberg.

In order to become a prison guard, applicants must go through rigorous background checks.  They are subjected to criminal background checks, credit checks, and character investigations.  So why aren’t these catching the corruption before they enter the force?  Most of these guards have clean records leading up to their application.  Once inside prison walls though, they are influenced by the manipulation and money of the inmates.  Some say that poor salaries and a bad economy puts financial strain on prison guards, and this leads them to be more likely to get involved in criminal activities. 

While the investigation of potential guards seems extensive at first, some background checks can be misleading in scope.  Unless an organization is using the right sources, they could miss past crimes altogether.  For instance, if they use a County Criminal search, they would find crimes committed in the selected counties where the person lived in the last seven years. If the person committed any crimes in other counties or states, they might miss those, unless the search was complemented with a national focused multi-jurisdictional search like the USOneSEARCH from backgroundchecks.com. 

 

Additionally, by only checking their employees when they first apply, prisons miss noticing any corruption that follows after the hire date.  By running regular background checks throughout the term of employment, they could find red flags for criminal behavior they could then keep an eye on.  Also, by offering guidance when problem signs start showing up, they could actually prevent corruption before it starts.

By teaming up with companies like backgroundchecks.com, prisons would have access to one of the largest databases in terms of criminal conviction sources, helping them to quickly implement a monitoring program.  Using the Ongoing Criminal Monitoring product, backgroundchecks.com can alert them to any new records they discover for an employee..  We have a dedicated data acquisition team constantly working to keep our databases current so that our information is as accurate as possible.  As one of the leading background check companies in the nation, backgroundchecks.com may be a valuable partner for prisons to have on their side.

About backgroundchecks.com -

backgroundchecks.com - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services.  Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., backgroundchecks.com is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit www.backgroundchecks.com.

Source:  http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-jail-contraband-smuggle-20111002,0,4648531.story

Industry News

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.