Tennessee Nursing Home Employee Worked for Six Years under False Identity

By Michael Klazema on 11/1/2013

Are background checks by definition fool-proof? A recent felony case in Gallatin, Tennessee has begged that question this month. According to reports, an individual  worked at a nursing and rehab healthcare center fox six years under a falsified identity. Worse, his employer claimed that the man had undergone a full federal background check, as well as a drug test, when he came aboard at the facility in 2007. If that's the case, then how the man's false identity got through a barrier of employment screening and hiring procedures might become the topic of conversation in the background check industry throughout the coming weeks.

That he worked for six years under a false identity is alarming, but not terribly surprising on its own. After all, a recent survey reported that at least five percent of Americans are likely doing the same. Sometimes these scams are uncovered if an employer runs a background check prior to employment. But what is so surprising about this case is that, unlike many other employees working with false identification, he was supposedly cleared by a federal background check six years ago. Furthermore, he managed to sneak through a background check while being hired to a job in the caretaking industry, a profession notoriously for meticulous screening processes.

Reports from Gallatin indicate that he used a social security number that he had purchased during his time living in the town. Whether or not he presented any Social Security card identification at all-upon being hired by the Gallatin Health Care Center has not yet been revealed.

If he was swapping Social Security numbers while serving as an employee of the Gallatin HealthCareCenter, then perhaps his employer would do well to periodically re-screen longtime employees in the future. While Espinoza's employer indicated that the man was a "model employee," and was unlikely, therefore, to have held any suspicion against him for the majority of his tenure, this case serves as an endorsement for periodic re-screening of current employees. The care center rightfully screens its employees upon application, but repeated background checks would help the business to assure that its workers had remained clean.

Implementing periodic background checks may sound daunting and costly to employers, but not every check needs to be run through the federal government. Private entities like can offer online screening services every bit as effectively as state or federal institutions, and since's standard screening process includes a Social Security Validation Test, it could be the perfect way for employers to root out potential identity thieves in their midst.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.