Background Check Flags Educational Discrepancy on Wal-Mart Executive's Resume

By Michael Klazema on 9/22/2014

Need a reason to never lie on your resume? Look no further than a high-ranking Wal-Mart executive, who recently resigned from his position after a background check discovered that some of the information he had provided on his resume was inaccurate.

For the executive who resigned from his roles as Wal-Mart's Vice President in early September, the discrepancy came in the form of an academic fib. Based on the resume, he had graduated from the University of Delaware in 1996, with a Bachelor of Arts degree. A recent background check, however, determined that he had never graduated from the school, and therefore did not have a college degree at all.

He managed to last eight years with Wal-Mart and climb the company ladder significantly without the information about his false academic past coming out. However, when the 40-year-old executive was promoted in February of this year, it lead Wal-Mart to do a more extensive background check into his past than had been run before. These more detailed background checks are required for higher-up executive positions within the Wal-Mart corporation.

According to the investigation, hedid attend the University of Delaware but ultimately left the school without completing his academic studies or clearing all of the requirements necessary for graduation. Despite the incomplete degree, though, he was able to find high-profile jobs that given his recent resignation from Wal-Mart probably required a Bachelor's degree to apply. Before joining Wal-Mart in 2006, for instance, he had also worked with the Altria Group, a significant tobacco company.

In his letter of resignation, he did not bring up the academic discrepancies or the background check that found them, as his reason for departure. Instead, he merely wrote that he had loved his time at Wal-Mart, but was looking forward to new adventures.

Still, his story and the fact that it has reached national media is positive proof that lying on job applications or resumes is a mistake. Even if an initial employment background check doesn't uncover your untruthfulness, there is always a chance that it can still be revealed down the road by a repeat background check, and such discoveries can lose you your job and impact you negatively for years to come. It is far better to be upfront about the skills and credentials you do have, as well as the ones you lack. Employers almost always value honesty above all else, and while they might consider hiring someone without the impressive degree or job title you are thinking about adding, they will absolutely not hire a liar.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.