Minnesota Struggles with Teacher Sex Offender Cases

By Michael Klazema on 10/13/2014

Does Minnesota need to overhaul its policies for background checking teachers? Based on recent news headlines involving teachers arrested for sexual conduct with students, the answer to that question is yes.

The series of sexual misconduct cases began in the Twin Cities, when a 27-year-old tennis coach was arrested and charged with two counts of criminal sexual conduct with a student. The coach allegedly began a sexual relationship with one of his students when she was a 15-year-old freshman at the school where he worked. The victim says that the coach also told her about at least three other relationships he'd had with minors.

The second case concerns a 28-year-old female math teacher at a catholic school in Austin, Minnesota. The woman was arrested and charged with third-degree sexual assault, based on suspicion that she had maintained a sexual relationship with a student.

The third and final case (for now) involves a Minneapolis teacher who allegedly stalked and sexually harassed one of his students. The 46-year-old man has admitted to sending numerous texts to a 17-year-old student in his class, many of them of a sexually explicit nature. Sources say that the teacher was actively pressuring the student to have sex with him, but that a sexual relationship, fortunately, never began.

All three teachers will likely face harsh consequences for their crimes, including jail time, probation, and the necessity to register as sex offenders. The Minneapolis man who stalked his student will also be required to go through a psychosexual evaluation and a full sex offender treatment program.

These punishments should theoretically keep all three teachers from ever working in a school system again, or from working with minors in any capacity. However, the fact that three sexual misconduct cases arose in Minnesota schools in such close proximity to one another begs the question of whether or not the state is doing enough with background checks to keep students safe.

For its part, Minnesota law does require all private and public schools in the state to run background checks on teachers. Those checks can either be run through the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension or through a private agency, hired by the school itself. Teachers also have to go through a background check to be licensed with the Minnesota Board of Teaching.

So someone is looking into the pasts of these teachers, but there are still numerous questions to be asked. For one, what do the background checks entail? One of Minnesota's problems is that there is very little uniformity. Schools that go just through the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension only get criminal histories from within the state of Minnesota. The Minnesota Board of Teaching looks at FBI records, but that's only a one-time check, meaning that things can still fall through the cracks.

In recent years, many schools gave gotten more vigilant about background checks. In Minnesota, that has meant foregoing the BCA and working with private firms to find out more about employees. Still though, for employees like the Twin Cities tennis coach, these background checks are still failing. The coach in question was young and had no criminal history, so nothing showed up on his background check. However, if the man had been involved in relationships with minors in the past, someone should have known about it, or at least noticed that something was not quite right. This information can't always be gleaned from a criminal history search, but it can often be revealed through reference checks, talks with old employers, or even just in-depth interviews with the applicant.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.