High School Grounds Worker Assault Case Proves that Threats are Still Finding a Way onto Campus

By Michael Klazema on 11/10/2014

One of the biggest trends in the background check industry over the past few years has been a campaign to make schools safer and more secure. In the wake of school shootings such as the December 2012 Sandy Hook tragedy, school administrators throughout the country went back to the drawing board. Their solutions and protections have been multifaceted, from locking doors to hiring security guards. Schools throughout the nation have also doubled down on background checks since 2012, implementing new screening systems for everyone from coaches to bus drivers to school visitors.

Even in spite of all this effort, though, threats are still finding a way onto school campuses. That much was proven by a recent incident at New Deal High School in Lubbock, Texas. There, a grounds worker was arrested for allegedly assaulting a student. The student was not seriously injured, and the incident did not involve firearms or any other deadly weapons. However, it was a scare that caused some to question the school's background check policies.

The grounds worker in question was not an employee of the school. Rather, he was employed by a third-party contract company, entrusted with school maintenance issues. The worker was arrested after an alleged physical altercation between him and a senior student. Sources say the grounds worker punched the student.

The superintendent for the New Deal Independent School District said that state law requires all district workers and volunteers to undergo background checks. He said that the grounds worker in this case must have passed a background check since he wouldn't have been allowed to work on campus otherwise. Whether the background check was run by the school or the contracting firm, though, is unclear. Also unclear is what type of background check was run, and whether the school district and the contracting firm would have followed similar screening policies.

Even without knowing precisely which background checks were run, though, it's clear that New Deal is a school that takes the safety of students seriously. The school district, like several others in Texas, participates in the school marshal program. That means that numerous educators working for the school district have been trained to use and carry firearms. The theory is that these armed teachers would be able to defend the school if any serious threat arose.

Still, it's clear that schools have to be a bit more vigilant about who they bring onto their campuses if incidents like this particular assault case are still happening. Perhaps an extension of the existing screening program that extends to the contingent workforce. Or maybe personality assessments could help keep volatile individuals out of school-related employment positions. Schools spend a lot of time and resources making sure they have the right teachers and administrators onboard: they shouldn't do any less for contract workers.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.