Minnesota Fireman Charged with Arson, Has Criminal History

By Michael Klazema on 2/26/2015

A volunteer firefighter in Lake Park, Minnesota is being accused of arson, after evidence built up that he was responsible for a number of grass fires in the area last spring. The man in question, a 35-year-old local, has a colorful criminal history that includes burglary and theft, careless driving, driving after having his license revoked, and more. The fire department knew about the charges, but allowed him to serve as a volunteer firefighter anyway. The man joined the fire department in early 2014, shortly before suspicious grass fires began springing up in the area.

Whether or not the Lake Park fire department was right to take on a person with a flurry of criminal activity depends on perspective. On one hand, the man's charges could have suggested that he did not possess the upstanding and trustworthy moral character required of a public safety employee. On the other hand, his most recent charges were from 2008, six years old by the time he came to Lake Park's fire department. He could have turned over a new leaf and tried to build a better life. In the end, department officials gave him the benefit of the doubt.

That decision, it turned out, was the wrong one. Shortly after the man joined Lake Park's volunteer firefighter squad, there was a substantial increase in grass fires in the area. By itself, the sharp uptick in frequency of these types of fires would have been suspicious. The spring of 2014 was also a wet period in Lake Park—not exactly the conditions that cause grass fires. As a result, the fire department knew fairly early on that someone had to be starting the fires on purpose. They just weren't sure who the culprit was.

Then, things started to come into focus. There was one volunteer firefighter who would arrive on the scene of every incident, and given the fact that he had just recently joined the department, he became a suspect. Shortly thereafter, he was linked to the 911 calls for the fires through voice recognition and phone records. Investigators even put a tracking device on his car to put him at the scene of a later crime. The man is now facing five years in prison and a $10,000 fine for arson.

Obviously, situations like this one aren't terribly common, and aren't something that most human resources directors will have to worry about when reviewing background check reports. Still, the story is proof that, sometimes, even the slightest patterns of dishonesty or questionable morals in an applicant can indicate trouble ahead.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.