Why Aren't Background Checks Required for Bus Drivers in Kansas?

By Michael Klazema on 5/18/2015

Following news that a Topeka, Kansas school bus driver was arrested on child pornography charges, everyone from parents to state news outlets are wondering what steps are taken to prevent child predators and other criminals from securing such positions. The charges come not from Kansas, but from Coryell County, Texas, where an active warrant was out for the suspect's arrest. The man fled from Texas to Kansas after learning that he was wanted on child pornography charges. In other words, there was an active warrant out for his arrest when he was hired in April as a bus driver by the Kansas-based company, Durham School Services.

According to Durham School Services, the suspect actually was subject to an employee screening process prior to his hire date. In a statement made to the media, Durham said that all bus drivers go through a "stringent hiring process," including "drug an alcohol testing, driving record and background checks, and medical exams, among other screening tools." The statement also noted that the company "meets State and Federal mandates for school bus driver screening; an interesting point, since Kansas has no state laws on the books requiring school bus driver background checks. The Kansas Department of Education does have stringent screening requirements for teachers, including fingerprinting and background checks through the Kansas Bureau of Investigations. Some other staff members, though, like teacher's aides, bus drivers, or contractors, are not legally required to face background checks. It's up to the school district to decide who gets a background check and who doesn't.

In this case, it was up to the third-party company that actually employed the bus driver. Many public school districts, not just in Kansas, but throughout the United States, as well, contract bus services through outside firms. Some schools take steps to make sure these firms are running background checks on their bus drivers, while others might run their own background checks on drivers assigned to school bus duty. It's not clear exactly how things worked in this specific case, though there's no reason to assume that Durham School Services are lying when they say that checks were conducted.

What is in doubt is whether the checks were thorough and comprehensive enough. Did the screenings reach beyond state lines? Did they assess the suspect's address history to see where he had lived before? Did they include reference checks, or calls to previous employers, to learn why the man left Texas so promptly? Had these precautions been taken, Durham School Services might have been able to formulate a more comprehensive profile of the person they were hiring, or to learn about the things he had done in the past. However, without a state law regulating school bus drivers and calling for certain types of background checks, it's easy to see why such "above and beyond" measures weren't taken.

At, situations like this are why we always encourage our clients to look beyond the current county or state lines where somebody lives or is being employed when running background checks. Just because someone is clean according to local court records or state repositories doesn't mean they are not hiding a criminal past elsewhere. In this case, an address history search could have determined that the suspect previously lived in Coryell County, Texas, and a comprehensive criminal search could have revealed the warrant for his arrest.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.