Delaware Restricts Employer Access to Social Media

By Michael Klazema on 8/14/2015

Delaware is the newest state to restrict employer’s access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. Delaware House Bill 109 became effective when the Governor approved it on August 7, 2015.

Delaware’s new law applies to all employers in the State, except the United States government. It defines “employer” as any person or group of persons acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee or applicant, including the State and any political subdivision or board, department, commission, or school district. The law makes it unlawful for employers, subject to certain exceptions, to require or request an employee or applicant to:

1.    Disclose a username or password for the purpose of enabling the employer to access personal social media;

2.    Access personal social media in the presence of the employer;

3.    Use personal social media as a condition of employment;

4.    Divulge any personal social media;

5.    Add a person, including the employer, to the list of contacts associated with the employee’s or applicant’s personal social media, or invite or accept an invitation from any person, including the employer, to join a group associated with the employee’s or applicant’s personal social media; and

6.    Alter the settings on the employee’s or applicant’s personal social media that affect a third party’s ability to view the content of the personal social media.

Exceptions to Delaware’s restrictions are very similar to what we have seen other states enact. The restrictions do not apply for the purpose of accessing electronic devices or accounts and services provided by the employer for work-related purposes. Employers are also permitted to monitor, review, access, and block electronic data stored on an employer’s network or electronic device that it supplies or pays for in whole or in part. Employers are permitted to conduct investigations into allegations of workplace misconduct or employee violations of applicable laws and regulations.  The law does not impede an employer from complying with a duty to screen employees or applicants before hiring, or to monitor or retain employee communications when required by law or in relation to law enforcement employment. Finally, information that is in the public domain is also exempt from the law.

The law specifies that employers must not discharge, discipline, threaten to discharge or discipline, or otherwise retaliate against an employee or applicant for failing to comply with a request or demand by the employer that violates the law. However, the law does not prohibit an employer from terminating or otherwise taking an adverse action against an employee or applicant if otherwise permitted by law.

You may access Delaware’s House Bill 109 here:$file/legis.html?open

What This Means for You:

  • Delaware has made it illegal for employers to require employees and applicants to disclose user name and passwords that would allow the employer to access personal social media accounts. 
  • You should determine whether you have employees in the state of Delaware. 
  • If you do, review your workplace policies and procedures with your lawyer to ensure compliance with the new law.

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.