Blog

 
     

Washington, D.C. Passes Fair Credit in Employment Amendment Act

By Michael Klazema on 1/26/2017
Washington, D.C. employers wishing to run credit checks on prospective hires will have more difficulty doing so under a new act passed by the local City Council. Per a report from JD Supra Business Advisor, the D.C. City Council has voted to pass the Fair Credit in Employment Amendment Act. The Act doesn’t outright ban the use of credit checks for employment purposes, but it does restrict it considerably, reports explain.

As coverage indicates, when it was passed in 1970, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) was designed to make sure that credit reports provided by consumer reporting agencies were completely accurate. Under the Act, employers seeking credit reports from their job applicants must get written permission to do so. If an employer decides to take adverse hiring action due to information found on the credit report (e.g. not hire the applicant), the organization must first take several steps. The employer must notify the applicant of the adverse action, provide the applicant with a free copy of the credit report, and allow the applicant to dispute the accuracy of the information contained in the report.

Now, reports indicate, legislators and regulators are questioning whether credit reports have a place in job screenings at all. The D.C. City Council proposed that credit history was not a relevant or “reliable way to measure a person’s ability to do a job.” That belief ultimately led to the passing of the Amendment Act.

The act prohibits employers in the D.C. area from running credit checks at any point in the hiring or screening process. Previously, reports explain, employers would typically ask for a credit report only after extending a contingent job offer. Such practices are now banned under the Fair Credit in Employment Amendment Act.

There are seven exceptions to the act. These exceptions are:

1. Employers who are required by existing laws to ask for credit history checks.

2. Employers hiring police officers or other law enforcement officers.

3. Positions in the Office of the Chief Financial Officer of D.C.

4. Jobs that involve security clearance requirements.

5. Positions that require government employees or officials to disclose credit information to certain government offices.

6. Jobs with financial institutions that involve “access to personal financial information.”

7. Employers pursuing “lawful subpoena, court order, or law enforcement investigation” against their employees or applicants.

All employers who are exempt from the Fair Credit in Employment Amendment Act must still comply with all provisions of the FCRA.

Sources: http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/d-c-joins-other-states-in-banning-72599/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Credit_Reporting_Act

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • April 10 — Oregon legislators have proposed a bill that would allow ridesharing companies to operate statewide. The bill’s critics argue that it doesn’t call for fingerprint background checks and would make it difficult for local municipalities to impose their own regulations.
  • April 06 — Idaho State University recently instituted a background check policy for faculty members and other full-time staff. Previously, the school only conducted reference checks.
  • April 03 — An Illinois man has been sentenced to three years in prison for failing to register as a sex offender and working as a youth sports referee. The state legislature is considering a bill that would require more in-depth background checks for licensed sporting officials.
  • March 13 — A Denver hospital was in the headlines last year for hiring a surgery technician who stole syringes of the painkiller fentanyl. New information suggests that a more thorough background check could have flagged the man’s addiction issues.
  • March 08 — On September 26, 2016, the state of California passed Assembly Bill 1843 that amended the Labor Code by prohibiting employers from asking an applicant for employment to disclose certain juvenile records. The amended Labor Code has been effective since January 1, 2017.
  • March 08 — For the past 5 years, backgroundchecks.com has reported rulings of district courts around the country that have ruled that an employer’s inclusion of a liability waiver or other extraneous information in a disclosure violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s (“FCRA”) disclosure requirements found in §604(b)(2)(a). Now, for the first time, a federal court of appeals has weighed in on the disclosure requirement.
  • March 07 — The Kentucky State Senate has approved a piece of legislation that would open the state’s child abuse and neglect registry to schools, camps, and parents. If passed, the law would allow anyone to request a search of the database.
  • March 06 — A federal judge in Florida has ruled that a plaintiff with a case against Amazon.com has the right to sue the company for an alleged violation of the FCRA. The suit accuses Amazon of failing to provide a standalone background check disclosure form free of extraneous information.
  • March 05 — A federal judge in Florida has ruled that a plaintiff with a case against Amazon.com has the right to sue the company for an alleged violation of the FCRA. The suit accuses Amazon of failing to provide a standalone background check disclosure form free of extraneous information.
  • February 21 — In January, a Washington, D.C. contractor was fired for being reckless with confidential patient files. The woman had a criminal record with two felony convictions, but a local background check did not list the offenses.