Indianapolis Woman Files FCRA Claim Against Area Employer

By Michael Klazema on 5/2/2017

A healthcare management company based in Indianapolis is facing a lawsuit over an alleged violation of FCRA provisions, per a report from the Indianapolis Star. Last March, Michele Petry applied for a job with healthcare company IDE Management. Petry, a nurse with a record that the Star describes as “squeaky clean,” was surprised when IDE informed her that they could not hire her due to findings on a criminal background check.

As coverage explains, under the Fair Credit Employment Act, employers who use background checks to vet their prospective employees must follow a strict and specific policy. For instance, under FCRA guidance, employers must notify individuals in writing when they make adverse employment decisions related to background check findings. If an employer makes an employment decision based on a background check, the employer must provide the job candidate with a copy of the background check report and the candidate must have an opportunity to dispute the accuracy of the background check findings.

Petry applied for a nursing job with IDE in March of 2016, went through the full interview process, and was given a conditional offer of employment. Once she passed a background check, coverage notes, the job was hers.

When Petry submitted to the background check, it turned up several felonies in her name, including convictions for theft and possession of drug paraphernalia. Petry claims the record is incorrect, coverage notes.

Petry alleges that IDE quickly rescinded her job offer but did not tell her why—either verbally or in writing—until she asked. The company cited findings from its background check process but refused to furnish her with a copy of the background check report or give her contact information for the company that prepared the report. In the Indianapolis Star article, the background check company is referred to only as “an unknown consumer reporting agency.”

If Petry’s allegations are true, then IDE may have violated the FCRA by not providing a timely written explanation post-check and by refusing to provide Petry with a copy of the report. IDE Management also did not provide Petry with the name, address, and phone number of the company that prepared the background check report. Under the FCRA, individuals who lose job opportunities due to background checks have the right to contact the background check company and ask for an additional copy of the background check report within 62 day, coverage explains. Candidates have the right to dispute the findings of the background check report with the company that compiled it.

According to the Indianapolis Star, IDE Management has declined to comment on Petry’s lawsuit. The company could face fines or other consequences if found guilty of FCRA violations.




Industry News
  FCRA  Indiana

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.