Blog

 
     

What Is Amazon’s Background Check Policy?

By Michael Klazema on 4/18/2018

Amazon’s background check policy requires all finalists to complete criminal background searches, reference checks, and drug tests. According to people who have interviewed for the company, Amazon’s criminal background checks look back seven years and consider any convictions from that time. The company makes a hiring decision “within a few business days.” Candidates who are disqualified based on their background checks are notified in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act. 

Because Amazon is a global organization that hires people from many jurisdictions, the company’s criminal background checks are quite broad. To prepare for one of these checks, you might consider using backgroundchecks.com’s National Criminal Background Check service to conduct a powerful background check on yourself. 

Once you have an account with backgroundchecks.com, consider purchasing county or state background checks in your jurisdiction to get a sense of what Amazon’s employers will see when they look at your history. If there are red flags on your record that shouldn’t be there, a self-screening will help you identify them before they come up on an Amazon background check and influence your job chances.

Amazon is extremely vigilant about conducting drug screenings on new hires and existing employees. The drug test typically occurs in Amazon’s hiring process after an interview or orientation session and criminal background and reference checks. Once a candidate has been identified as a likely hire—or given a conditional offer of employment—Amazon uses a mouth swab test to check for drugs. This test is designed to find traces of common drugs including cannabis, cocaine, and meth. Once employees are hired, they are required to complete an annual medical exam each year which includes random drug screenings.

To see if you are prepared for Amazon.com’s drug screening check, consider ordering a home drug test and administering it to yourself.

 


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • November 20 The #MeToo movement is bringing about legislative changes employers need to know about. We review some of the laws recently passed in California.
  • November 15

    Replacing an inconsistent array of procedures, Ontario's government has passed into law a reform act intended to clarify how police departments should handle requests for information to be used in background checks. 


  • November 14 The federal government has vowed to cut its backlog of security clearance background checks in half by spring. Currently, the backlog is approximately 600,000 names strong.
  • November 08 A Texas-based company was found to be supplying landlords with inaccurate background check results, potentially affecting housing decisions. The company must pay a record-setting settlement.
  • November 07 Orange Leaf Frozen Yogurt brand trusts backgroundchecks.com to perform the crucial function of background checks on job candidates before extending offers of employment.
  • November 06 The man previously responsible for running background checks on New York City’s school bus drivers says the city’s Department of Education has been pushing back against more thorough checks. The DOE reportedly circumnavigated proper bus driver vetting channels for most of the spring and summer this year.
  • November 06 If you have a series of speeding tickets or other traffic violations, do you need to disclose them as criminal history?
  • November 01 South Carolina's legislature recently adopted a measure to expand access to expungement opportunities for the state's ex-convicts, but other gaps in the process remain. Advocates disagree on how to address the problem to protect offenders as well as the public.
  • October 31 Background checks will show different things depending on the type of check. Here are a few ways employers can use background checks to learn about candidates.
  • October 30 The Pentagon recently disclosed a breach that exposed the personal information of roughly 30,000 personnel. The government blamed the breach on a contractor, calling into question background check policies for federal government vendors.