States and Cities Set Sights on Curtailing Wage Inequality

By Michael Klazema on 6/22/2018

The gender pay gap has been a topic of concern for quite some time now. Recently, more state and local governments have joined the effort to combat wage inequality using new regulation. Coming in the wake of the growing ban the box movement that has seen legislative success in many places across the U.S., lawmakers have begun targeting what they say is one of the notable causes of the pay gap: the consideration of salary histories. From California to Connecticut to Illinois, there are fresh and successful efforts to restrict access to this information.

For many employers, payroll equals a substantial percentage of operating costs, and making decisions on employee compensation can directly impact net income. To that end, when determining what salary to offer to a prospective new hire, some employers will require the applicant to disclose their pay rates in prior job roles. In other cases, they may discover this information through a background check. During an employment verification check like the one provided by, salary data appears if disclosed by the business. Curtailing this process has become a goal of the fair wage movement.

The reasoning behind advocating for pay equity by targeting the use of salary information is as follows. Women, who are typically paid less than men, can easily become locked into a cycle where they are consistently underpaid. Even when moving to new positions, their salary history, often lower than a man's, will influence an employer to offer them less money than they would offer to a man for the same position. By eliminating the ability to ask for or consider this information, applicants may be more likely to receive fair value for their labor.

In Connecticut, Governor Dannel Malloy signed a new law in May banning employers from asking about salaries during the hiring process. However, the law did not restrict considering such information if uncovered through secondary means like a background check. San Francisco not only banned salary questions but also prohibited businesses from sharing salary info without explicit consent from the employee. 

San Francisco's law makes it clear that criminal background checks remain appropriate to use for employment purposes. For such services as's Employment Verification, usage by employers is still acceptable — but if salary information appears, businesses must ignore it.

The Illinois Senate recently passed a bill to introduce similar equity regulations; it is still in the legislative process. Hawaii sent a bill to its governor for consideration in early May. While some legislators, like those in New York, have also worked to expand restrictions to include credit reports, these efforts have seen limited success.

These new regulations add an extra layer of complexity to hiring decisions for employers. stays up to date on all the latest developments around the country, providing criminal history checks, credit reports, and other services in line with all applicable laws. As additional states look to equalize the playing field for their citizens, compliance in these areas will grow in importance.

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • July 17 — Hourly Employee Screening: What Makes It Unique and Important infographic?Modern employers conduct background checks on most of the people they hire. These checks are most often used to screen full-time salaried workers. Part-timers and hourly employees are typically less likely to face a thorough background check or even go through a background screening at all. According to a survey conducted by, 67 percent of employers screen all of their part-time employees, compared to 83 percent of their full-time employees.
  • July 17 A Kentucky school district recently decided to stop paying for volunteer background checks. Going forward, volunteers will be expected to cover the cost of their own checks, which is $10 per person.
  • July 12 Seeking fresh employees for businesses, some states seek to reduce the number of people denied employment based on old or nonviolent crimes.
  • July 11 Multinational aerospace company - Safran Group - trusts to screen new hires, The products they manufacture can have major implications for aircraft safety and worldwide security. As such, the company needs to be extremely careful and deliberate about who it trusts to join the organization.
  • July 11 Recently cited for driving too fast? Here’s what a speeding ticket will do to your background check report.
  • July 10

    Could your business be vulnerable to employee theft? Protect yourself with more thorough background checks.

  • July 09 While Social Security Numbers aren’t required for criminal history checks, they can be beneficial. Here’s why.
  • July 05

    In June, Chicago Public Schools came under fire after a Chicago Tribune piece accused the district of not protecting students from sexual abusers. The district has announced plans to run background checks on all employees.

  • July 04 — How important are volunteer background checks? Do they even matter?
    Organizations that rely in part on volunteer labor consistently find themselves asking these questions. The assumption is usually that volunteer background checks are less important than background checks for full-time or part-time employees. According to a CareerBuilder survey from 2016, 72 percent of employers conduct background checks on all employees. A parallel statistic isn’t even available for volunteer checks. They are less common – and less valued.
  • July 03 #MeToo harassment allegations continue to reshape workplaces in every industry. As a result, many companies are looking to safeguard themselves from liability.