The Necessity of Background Screenings for Contractors

By Michael Klazema on 7/20/2018

Contractors are playing a larger role in both the private and public sectors. The government relies on a huge number of contractors in practically every department, supplementing career civil service employees in everything from technological development and deployment to more mundane and basic tasks. While often viewed as "temporary,” especially in the case of contractors whose work for an agency takes place over weeks or months, these individuals frequently have access to critical systems and sensitive data. For that reason, contractors should receive the same level of consideration as a regular employee, including a thorough background check. 

Recent reports of contractor-related trouble on a government level lend this idea credence. The Environmental Protection Agency currently does not know how many contractors it employs—or who among them work with sensitive data that requires careful safeguards. After investigating the EPA, the Office of the Inspector General reported many contractors did not have complete background checks on file, and some did not pass their checks. 

The IG also discovered contractors who were double- or over-billing the government for work. Three congressmen have since demanded the EPA produce information on its vetting procedures and contractor numbers. 

The EPA is not the only federal agency struggle to vet its contractors. The Federal Acquisition Service, a part of the General Services Administration whose job is to facilitate the government's purchase of goods and services, has come under fire from its own Inspector General. Contractors faced a requirement to complete standard background checks before receiving clearance to handle potentially sensitive data. However, work commenced before the completion of the checks. The IG slammed the discovery for placing the agency at substantial risk for consequences if one of the contractors had acted improperly.

These stories highlight the key reasons why all businesses, regardless of their industry, should make background checks a priority for contractors. Even a simple state-level background check by can throw up red flags that help shield a business from undue risk. For example, a business handling highly sensitive information for customers would likely want to avoid hiring someone previously convicted of identity fraud. The risk of incurring damages by relying on such a contractor would simply be too high, to say nothing of the risk of permanent damage to a company's reputation. 

While screening is no guarantee against something such as disingenuous billing practices, it can reduce a company's exposure. Doing due diligence can, in some cases, protect a business from liability if a contractor does create trouble. At, we provide a tailored contractor background check to streamline the process of onboarding dependable, trustworthy individuals. By taking the same care with contractors as you would a fully-fledged employee, you can place your confidence in the team you've built and avoid unnecessary trouble.

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • August 10 Moore Advanced teamed up with to secure the best possible hires. Read more about how this process has assisted them.
  • August 10 An adjudication withheld is a court agreement that doesn’t qualify as a conviction but can make matters confusing for individuals applying for jobs. Should you disclose a withheld adjudication to a prospective employer?
  • August 09 With adults now legally using recreational marijuana in numerous states, and with additional legalization efforts in the wings, expungement of old and minor drug-related convictions is more important than ever.
  • August 07 A West Virginia TV station is pushing the state’s Child Protective Services and Department of Health and Human Services to answer questions about background check policies. A CPS employee was recently charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, domestic assault, and threatening a police officer.
  • August 02 Woes continue for ridesharing companies struggling to keep riders safe after a man, illegally in the United States, was arrested and accused of several rapes dating back years.
  • July 31 South Carolina legislators recently passed a new law that will change the language of the state’s expungement policy. The new law will make expungement possible for repeat offenders. The previous law only allowed first offenses to be scrubbed from the public record.
  • July 26

    Hawaii employers have been banned from asking job applicants about their salary history. The new act’s effective date is January 1, 2019, and covers all employers that have at least one employee in that state.

  • July 26

    The expansion of the The North Carolina Certificate of Relief  Law, offers relief to jobseekers. An employer may take into consideration a certificate of relief despite the applicant’s criminal past; however, the certificate is not an expungement or pardon.

  • July 26

    With growing concerns about liability, businesses are transitioning away from one-time background checks in favor of continuous checks. The results are impacting both employers and employees.

  • July 25 Uber is officially launching a new ongoing criminal monitoring policy for drivers. The company started rolling out the new system in early July and will expand it in the months to come.