Seattle Stops Landlords from Checking Criminal Histories of Tenants

By Michael Klazema on 6/4/2019

For employment and housing situations alike, banning the box is becoming a common legislative requirement. By barring employers and landlords from asking about criminal history on job or housing applications and delaying background checks until later in the screening process, lawmakers are hoping to make it easier for ex-offenders to re-enter society.

In Seattle, the movement has gone one step further: the “Fair Chance Housing Ordinance” prohibits landlords from conducting criminal background checks on their tenants at all. Per a report from NBC News, some landlords in Seattle are not happy about the ordinance—and they are fighting back.

Seattle’s fair housing ordinance is the most extreme such law in the country. Other major cities, such as Detroit and Chicago, have banned the box for housing applications but have not banned background checks.

The only landlords in Seattle who can still run criminal history checks on their tenants are those who rent out rooms in their own homes or accessory dwelling units on their properties. The NBC News article notes that sex offender checks are allowed “in some circumstances.”

On behalf of several landlords in the city of Seattle, the Pacific Legal Foundation has filed a lawsuit against the city targeting the Fair Chance Housing Ordinance. The lawsuit alleges that the ordinance violates due process and overreaches by barring landlords from accessing public records. The Washington Supreme Court will hear the case in June.

This ordinance is not the first local law that Seattle has implemented with the stated goal of making housing more accessible for all. A few years ago, the city passed the “first-in-time” law, a regulation demanding that a landlord accept the first qualified tenant who applied to live in a rental property. The law was intended to end racial discrimination in housing but was ultimately deemed unconstitutional by a state court: the “first-in-time” law, the court ruled, violated a private property rights provision laid out in the state constitution.

The city ultimately appealed the decision, and the case is still active. Courts will decide both the fate of the “first-in-time” law and the Fair Chance Housing Ordinance this June.

Ethan Blevins, a Pacific Legal Foundation attorney participating in the lawsuit over the Fair Chance Housing Ordinance, told NBC News that the law overreaches by leaving landlords unable to vet their tenants properly. Landlords, Blevins said, need to be able to make decisions that protect their interests, their property, and other tenants. Not having the option of looking into a prospective tenant’s criminal history makes those peace-of-mind decisions difficult, he claimed.

Proponents of the Fair Chance Housing Ordinance argue that it helps to reduce recidivism by making housing more accessible for individuals with criminal backgrounds.



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • July 16 A New Jersey organization that was administering federal grant-funded programs has agreed to pay a $1.1 million settlement for failing to conduct background checks on 46 volunteers.
  • July 11 Under an innovative program that went into effect July 1, Pennsylvania will automatically seal many old criminal records. 
  • July 09 In October, the Georgia Long-Term Care Background Check Program will officially go into effect. Here’s what employers in the state need to know about the law.
  • July 04 Despite the failure of a full-scale legalization effort, New York state has reduced cannabis-related penalties and introduced automatic expungement.
  • July 03 Preparing for the employment background check process can improve your chances of getting hired. Here’s how to do it.
  • July 02 Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District in North Carolina stopped fingerprinting new hires last July even though board policy requires fingerprinting during pre-hire background checks. The fingerprinting “pause” caused alarm in the Charlotte community.
  • June 27 In 2012, the EEOC published new guidelines instructing employers not to use blanket bans against applicants with criminal records. The state of Texas sued. Today, arguments continue in federal circuit court.
  • June 25 Learn the differences between infractions, misdemeanors, and felonies and what each run-in with the law means for a background check report.
  • June 25 A recent federal court ruling has called into question how employers should observe the FCRA when filling independent contractor positions rather than full- or part-time jobs. Many sections of the FCRA are only relevant if background checks are intended for “employment purposes.”
  • June 20 The ACLU has filed suit against the owner of an apartment complex in Virginia alleging discriminatory practices. The owner contends otherwise.