Blog

 
     

The Growth in Compliance Concerns

By Michael Klazema on 5/28/2019
The world of background checks compliance is always changing. On the one hand, most employers feel obligated to vet their new hires to avoid negligent hiring lawsuits and similar concerns. On the other hand, the number of laws and local ordinances that regulate, stipulate, or limit the use of background checks is growing, giving employers new challenges as they form background check policies that are both compliant and comprehensive.

Employers need to tread carefully to make sure that they are not overstepping any of the boundaries of background checks compliance. Here are several of the regulatory concerns that currently affect employer background checks.

Ban the Box

Perhaps the biggest regulatory trend in background checks is the rise of ban the box legislation. The ban the box movement is pushing for questions about criminal history to be removed from job applications. The idea is that someone with a criminal record should have the chance to prove his or her fitness for a job without criminal history being a factor. Employers still have a right to conduct background checks, but many ban the box laws delay those checks until after the first interview—or even after the employer makes a job offer.

Currently, 35 states and more than 150 cities and counties have passed ban the box laws. All these laws are slightly different, with some applying only to public employers (government departments or offices) and others applying to private companies as well. Elected officials are constantly introducing ban the box legislation, which means that your area could have a ban the box law in place by next year even if it doesn’t right now.

Consult the National Employment Law Project to determine if ban the box compliance is required in your state, county, or city.

The Fair Credit Reporting Act

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) dictates how employers must go about using background checks for employment decisions. You must notify a candidate (and get his or her written consent) if you plan to vet that person with a background check.

If the findings of a background check lead you to disqualify someone from job consideration, the FCRA lays down the steps that you must follow next. Click here to learn more about FCRA compliance.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regularly issues guidance for how employers can use background checks in a job setting without inadvertently discriminating against minority groups. Specifically, the EEOC holds that a company’s hiring policies should not have a “disparate impact” on minorities.

One commonly-cited piece of EEOC guidance is that employers should consider every criminal record on a case-by-case basis, judging a candidate not just in light of his or her criminal history but on the crime, the relevance of that conviction to the job at hand, the amount of time that has elapsed since the conviction, and similar considerations.

Other Regulations

There are other factors regarding background checks compliance that employers must consider. For instance, specific industries often have their own requirements for background checks or hiring standards. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, for example, requires trucking companies and other companies that employ commercial drivers to conduct thorough pre-employment drug tests. Being familiar with the compliance factors in your industry is a must.

Other regulations are driven by geography. There are laws in different parts of the country regarding how arrest records can be used in hiring decisions. Read our white paper about background checks and arrest records to learn more. Some states—such as California, Illinois, and Washington—have banned the use of credit history checks for employment situations.

It can be challenging to balance due diligence with background checks compliance. Researching the background check laws in your city or state will help you get there.

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • July 11 Under an innovative program that went into effect July 1, Pennsylvania will automatically seal many old criminal records. 
  • July 09 In October, the Georgia Long-Term Care Background Check Program will officially go into effect. Here’s what employers in the state need to know about the law.
  • July 04 Despite the failure of a full-scale legalization effort, New York state has reduced cannabis-related penalties and introduced automatic expungement.
  • July 02 Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District in North Carolina stopped fingerprinting new hires last July even though board policy requires fingerprinting during pre-hire background checks. The fingerprinting “pause” caused alarm in the Charlotte community.
  • June 27 In 2012, the EEOC published new guidelines instructing employers not to use blanket bans against applicants with criminal records. The state of Texas sued. Today, arguments continue in federal circuit court.
  • June 25 Learn the differences between infractions, misdemeanors, and felonies and what each run-in with the law means for a background check report.
  • June 25 A recent federal court ruling has called into question how employers should observe the FCRA when filling independent contractor positions rather than full- or part-time jobs. Many sections of the FCRA are only relevant if background checks are intended for “employment purposes.”
  • June 20 The ACLU has filed suit against the owner of an apartment complex in Virginia alleging discriminatory practices. The owner contends otherwise.
  • June 19 If you need to conduct a quick background check, you may be wondering: are background checks instant? At backgroundchecks.com, we maintain several databases capable of generating instant background checks.
  • June 18 A recent audit in the Catholic Church conducted by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops found issues with background checks for priests in multiple dioceses.