7-Eleven Settles $2M FCRA Class Action Lawsuit

By Michael Klazema on 7/23/2019

The convenience store chain 7-Eleven recently paid out nearly $2 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleges it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The class-action lawsuit—Munoz v. 7-Eleven, Inc., filed in the state of California—spans approximately 50,000 job applicants. In addition to the settlement payout, the lawsuit will push 7-Eleven to correct its employee background check process to ensure FCRA compliance in the future.

The alleged violations involve the part of the FCRA that requires employers to utilize a standalone disclosure document when informing candidates about background checks. Under FCRA rules, the background check disclosure can either be provided as a standalone form or combined with the background check consent/authorization form. The form cannot include any other information, whether details about the job, employer, or background check provider. The idea is that the disclosure form or disclosure/authorization form will give candidates or employees complete clarity about what they are authorizing an employer or prospective employer to do during the vetting process.

Per a report from HR Dive, the lawsuit against 7-Eleven argues that the employer included extra information on its disclosure form, including details about the background check provider and relevant state laws. The form also asked for “a blanket authorization allowing the disclosure of information directly to 7-Eleven.”

7-Eleven ultimately agreed to settle the lawsuit, paying $1,972,500 to the class of applicants.

HR Dive noted that several other major companies have had recent legal troubles related to FCRA background check disclosures. These companies include Frito-Lay and Delta Air LinesWalmart is also facing a lawsuit for background checks that have allegedly had a disparate impact on minority applicants. In total, HR Dive said companies have paid out approximately $174 million in the past decade just to settle background check lawsuits.

Because most employers use the same basic background check process for every candidate they screen, a single lapse in FCRA compliance can snowball into a large and costly class-action lawsuit, especially for large national or multinational organizations: the impact of an FCRA faux pas will be amplified across many different locations. The 7-Eleven class-action case will cost the business about $40 per applicant, but that amount adds up given the number of class members.

Including unnecessary information or language in a disclosure is one of the most common violations of FCRA compliance. Many employers are unclear on which information is considered necessary for this form and which information is considered extraneous. For this reason, it is extremely important for employers to educate themselves on the finer points of FCRA compliance before implementing a new background check strategy.

At, we are happy to help by providing Learning Center pages that highlight important details about the FCRA and FCRA compliance. If you have any additional questions in this regard, feel free to contact us directly.



Industry News
  7-Eleven  FCRA

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • August 15 Background checks aren't a silver bullet that solves every concern about prospective new hires—they are a tool that must be used with care. How can an incorrect approach lead to inadequate vetting? 
  • August 13 How has legislation and regulation changed the way employers use criminal background checks? We look at some of the rules that modern companies must follow.
  • August 08 With many industries facing labor shortages, advocates and legislatures are reconsidering policies that exclude potential employees. Expansion of record expungement and "ban the box" rules could change the system. 
  • August 06 Continuous background screening or ongoing criminal monitoring is the best way to keep track of critical new developments on an employee’s criminal record. Learn how these background checks work. 
  • August 01

    A new lawsuit filed in New York alleges that department store chain Macy’s ignored federal hiring guidelines and laws, firing individuals for old and non-job-related criminal convictions. 


  • July 30 The Minneapolis City Council is considering a series of ordinances that would regulate the use of tenant background checks and security deposits. The city’s tight housing market has made it difficult for individuals with bad credit, eviction histories, or criminal records to find housing.
  • July 25 Following revelations about wrongdoing in USA Gymnastics at the hands of team doctor Larry Nasser, sports organizations must grapple with how to safeguard their members. Some have found more success than others. 
  • July 24 What do landlords want to know before accepting new tenants? Here are the basics included in the average tenant background check.
  • July 23 7-Eleven will pay nearly $2 million to settle a class-action lawsuit concerning its background check process. The lawsuit alleges that the convenience store chain violated the FCRA with its background check disclosure document.
  • July 22 Social and child service organization rely on background checks to vet employees, sponsors, drivers, and other staff members and volunteers. By helping to root out histories of violence, sexual abuse, and other red flags, our resources assist these organizations in keeping the people they serve safe.