Are Social Media Background Checks on the Decline?

By Michael Klazema on 1/2/2014

For years, it has seemed as if more and more employers were turning toward social media as a means of learning more about their applicants. And indeed, social networks like Facebook have given employers windows into the lives of their prospective employees like never before. By simply directing their Internet browser to an applicant’s Facebook profile, an employer can see how an applicant lives his or her life and treats other people. They say that a picture is worth 1,000 words, and on Facebook, an album of inappropriate photos – combined with a vulgar status or two – can tell an employer everything they need to know about an applicant who doesn’t fit their image of a respectful and respectable employee.

Still, despite the possibilities that social media profiles add to the employment screening procedure, more and more employers seem to be opting out of the idea of doing a “social media background check.” In fact, it’s beginning to look as if 2014 may be the year that social media background checks almost entirely exit the picture.

There are a number of reasons for this shift: first of all, the EEOC has never been terribly comfortable with social media accounts being used for employment screening purposes. A Facebook page can give an employment manager access to information that they are not supposed to have, including an applicant’s religion, race, political affiliation, or sexual orientation. By revealing these pieces of information, social media background checks can become a tool for proliferating discrimination and hindering equal employment opportunity. By using social media for background checks, employers open themselves up to potential lawsuits for breaching EEOC anti-discrimination rules.

Secondly, numerous state governments have already put a stop to social media background checks in numerous spots around the country. In August, Oregon made sure that social media accounts were off limits for employment screening procedures. A month earlier, both Nevada and Colorado enacted similar measures to regulate or ban the use of social media background checks. It’s likely that more states will follow suit with their own legislation throughout 2014.

Finally, after years of hearing about how unprofessional social media activity could lose them a job, most job hunters have wised up and started implementing privacy measures to keep prying eyes away from their social media accounts. In many cases, employers who want to run a social media background check don’t even have the option to do so, thanks to privacy settings that lock them out of the accounts of job applicants.

All of these factors, both legal and otherwise, have led most hiring managers to shift away from using social media in employment screening. Instead, employers are opting to focus once more on traditional background checks, such as the products offered through From criminal searches to sex offender registry perusals, from professional and academic history verifications to drug screenings, employers can still learn plenty of information about their applicants through the classic background screening standards that have been used for years.

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.