Federal Security Clearance System Added to Government Accountability Office’s “High-Risk List”

By Michael Klazema on 2/20/2018
Federal auditors have identified the government’s security clearance screening process as a “high-risk” program, according to a recent report from

Compiled and maintained by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the “high-risk list” identifies the 35 highest-risk programs and departments in the federal government. The federal security clearance process was on the list from 2005 to 2011 but was removed at the start of the decade based on “substantial progress.” That progress has reportedly not continued at an acceptable pace, hence the program’s return to the high-risk list.

One of the big problems, according to the federal audit, is the security clearance system is simply too outdated to work properly in 2018. The program relies on “legacy information technology systems” that do not protect sensitive data as securely as they should. These systems are susceptible to hacks and have been the targets of data breaches in the recent past. In 2014, USIS, a security clearance contractor, suffered a data breach. The next year, the Office of Personnel Management was the victim of another breach.

Both USIS and the Office of Personnel Management were relieved of security-clearance-related responsibilities shortly after the breaches. The National Background Investigations Bureau was created to take over clearance duties from the OPM (though the organization exists within the OPM). Per coverage, little has been done to correct the security gaps that allowed the OPM breach to happen, which compromised sensitive personal information concerning 20 million former government employees and their family members.

In addition to IT security problems, the federal security clearance program is reportedly decrepit in the way it vets candidates for clearances. Rather than taking a data-focused approach, much of the screening process relies on in-person interviews. For decades, the screening process has used interviews with friends and neighbors to make determinations about prospective employees. These interviews must be conducted at the time of a federal hire and every five to ten years thereafter.

As of last September, the security clearance background check backlog includes more than 700,000 incomplete investigations. This backlog means background checks for security clearances take months to process. In comparison, at, we offer background check services that process instantlybackground check services that process instantly and others that take 1-3 business days on average.

The delays have consequences, allowing high-up government officials to work without proper security clearances. This month, controversy exploded over the background check of White House Staff Secretary Rob Porter, accused of domestic abuse by both of his ex-wives. Porter was allowed to work on an “interim security clearance” while his background check was taking place.

There is a proposed solution to the problem. Defense and intelligence officials want government agencies to switch to a system of “continuous evaluation.” This process regularly checks the public record for for arrest reports, credit activity, and other information. Continuous evaluation would allow for efficient ongoing screening of federal employees. It could also speed up the initial security clearance process and potentially help cut down the backlog.

“Continuous evaluation” is comparable to’s Ongoing Criminal Monitoring service. With this service, we help employers by running monthly background checks of their employees through our US OneSearch database. If we find new hits or red flags, we send the employer a notification.

Gene Dodaro, the head of the GAO, is expected to send a letter to the OPM that outlines his concerns about the security clearance process along with potential solutions.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.