Federal Security Clearance System Added to Government Accountability Office’s “High-Risk List”

By Michael Klazema on 2/20/2018
Federal auditors have identified the government’s security clearance screening process as a “high-risk” program, according to a recent report from

Compiled and maintained by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the “high-risk list” identifies the 35 highest-risk programs and departments in the federal government. The federal security clearance process was on the list from 2005 to 2011 but was removed at the start of the decade based on “substantial progress.” That progress has reportedly not continued at an acceptable pace, hence the program’s return to the high-risk list.

One of the big problems, according to the federal audit, is the security clearance system is simply too outdated to work properly in 2018. The program relies on “legacy information technology systems” that do not protect sensitive data as securely as they should. These systems are susceptible to hacks and have been the targets of data breaches in the recent past. In 2014, USIS, a security clearance contractor, suffered a data breach. The next year, the Office of Personnel Management was the victim of another breach.

Both USIS and the Office of Personnel Management were relieved of security-clearance-related responsibilities shortly after the breaches. The National Background Investigations Bureau was created to take over clearance duties from the OPM (though the organization exists within the OPM). Per coverage, little has been done to correct the security gaps that allowed the OPM breach to happen, which compromised sensitive personal information concerning 20 million former government employees and their family members.

In addition to IT security problems, the federal security clearance program is reportedly decrepit in the way it vets candidates for clearances. Rather than taking a data-focused approach, much of the screening process relies on in-person interviews. For decades, the screening process has used interviews with friends and neighbors to make determinations about prospective employees. These interviews must be conducted at the time of a federal hire and every five to ten years thereafter.

As of last September, the security clearance background check backlog includes more than 700,000 incomplete investigations. This backlog means background checks for security clearances take months to process. In comparison, at, we offer background check services that process instantlybackground check services that process instantly and others that take 1-3 business days on average.

The delays have consequences, allowing high-up government officials to work without proper security clearances. This month, controversy exploded over the background check of White House Staff Secretary Rob Porter, accused of domestic abuse by both of his ex-wives. Porter was allowed to work on an “interim security clearance” while his background check was taking place.

There is a proposed solution to the problem. Defense and intelligence officials want government agencies to switch to a system of “continuous evaluation.” This process regularly checks the public record for for arrest reports, credit activity, and other information. Continuous evaluation would allow for efficient ongoing screening of federal employees. It could also speed up the initial security clearance process and potentially help cut down the backlog.

“Continuous evaluation” is comparable to’s Ongoing Criminal Monitoring service. With this service, we help employers by running monthly background checks of their employees through our US OneSearch database. If we find new hits or red flags, we send the employer a notification.

Gene Dodaro, the head of the GAO, is expected to send a letter to the OPM that outlines his concerns about the security clearance process along with potential solutions.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.